Donate to ED • Donors • Advertise on ED
Talk:Fae
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Can we move this to Ashley Van Haeften? KimmoB 14:12, 30 January 2012 (CET)
- Typing in either one leads you to the same article; I see no reason for it. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 14:24, 30 January 2012 (CET)
- I'm not going to move it until Ashley van Haeften (currently Fæ on Wikipedia) admits to being Ash / Teahot. Unfortunately, a large minority of the Wikipedians want to allow Fæ to keep these sorts of secrets: wikipedia:Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Fæ. Due to the size of this minority, it's likely that the Request for comment will end in "No consensus to have Fæ disclose past accounts." Oddly, Wikipedia has a "tyranny of the minority" problem instead of a "tyranny of the majority" problem. --JuniusThaddeus 14:43, 30 January 2012 (CET)
- Every time I hear something new from you about wikipedia, it scares me. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 15:03, 30 January 2012 (CET)
- I'll admit to not being an expert on ED's rules, but the link between Teahot, Ash, Ashleyvh, Fæ and Ashley Van Haeften is rock solid, even if you use nothing but public information from TOW. KimmoB 14:58, 31 January 2012 (CET)
- Done. --JuniusThaddeus 15:09, 31 January 2012 (CET)
- Typing in either one leads you to the same article; I see no reason for it. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 14:24, 30 January 2012 (CET)
Contents |
Fae got in trouble lately
Looks like the Wikigods are trying to boot his sorry ass from the club. Why is this only a gallery, not a writeup proper tho? Mquinn 14:13, 7 June 2012 (EDT)
- You're free to expand the article, but I can't offer any assistance. --JuniusThaddeus 16:53, 7 June 2012 (EDT)
Not an attack article
This is is an archive of information that Fae himself uploaded to Wikipedia under accounts he has admitted to owning. There is no attack of any sort here. --zaiger (talk) 04:16, 20 June 2012 (EDT)
- dude looks hung. more like a puff piece, imo. ima go fap to these right now. -hipcrime
04:38, 20 June 2012 (EDT)
EGM
wtf is an egm? http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Call_for_EGM_2012
- -hipcrime
21:00, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
- wikipedia:Extraordinary_general_meeting. --JuniusThaddeus 22:43, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
- thanks. :) -hipcrime
22:45, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
- You're welcome. --JuniusThaddeus 23:16, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
- thanks. :) -hipcrime
- wikipedia:Extraordinary_general_meeting. --JuniusThaddeus 22:43, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
Sockpuppet editing
Someone should mimic influential Wikipedians when editing this; I'm unfamiliar with the Wikipedia community. Graham 03:15, 5 August 2012 (EDT)
He Was "Mounting" Personal Attacks, Eh?
...so who ~specifically~ was he "mounting" over there with these "personal attacks"? :3
--Onideus
03:25, 6 August 2012 (EDT)
banner
Is the banner necessary anymore since he is no longer welcome on Wikipedia? If so could it maybe be made a little smaller and less flashing? Like {{spoiler}} maybe?--zaiger (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2012 (EDT)
- {{spoiler}}ed. I didn't remove it completely because he seems to have some white knights on WP. VX brb, jews 14:18, 7 August 2012 (EDT)
linux for niggers
- lol -hipcrime
00:11, 9 August 2012 (EDT)
'Phone-hacking' LOL - Mr Jonzz
07:27, 9 August 2012 (EDT)
Fae is pissed
after going thru my contribs to this, i don't see where i called him a faggot. a sockpuppeteer and kinky porn uploader, sure... but not a faggot. anyway my comment got me banned from Commons. ;_; -hipcrime
18:21, 13 December 2012 (EST)
- please inform him I called him a cock gulping, shit eating fanny bandit who needs to choke to death on his own vomit-semen mix. Nothing personal, I'm just bandwagonning. Mike the Great (talk) 19:23, 13 December 2012 (EDT)
- you're the one who isn't banned. -hipcrime
18:29, 13 December 2012 (EST)
- you're the one who isn't banned. -hipcrime
mashable.com
- -hipcrime
09:00, 7 January 2013 (EST)
link dump
looks like Fae is being persecuted for being Jewish as well.
-hipcrime
11:12, 8 July 2013 (EDT)
Doxing saga
This article is missing Fae's greatest contribution to TOW drama- the legacy that remains today, long after the hammer has fallen permanently on his account and socks. The single biggest controversy over Fae on Wikipedia today is over his alleged outing. Whether he was doxed fairly or unfairly, out of necessity or malice, or laziness or prejudice. WP doesn't care one bit whether or not Fae is a faggot (which he doesn't deny) but cares rather extremely about his being labeled as a faggot (said labeling he has not consented to, despite his admitting he is indeed a faggot). The topic of Fae comes up frequently, whenever discussions of admin abuse, socking, policy, norms of conduct, b&s are invoked, and virtually always the core issue is "outing" and one side will hold Fae up as a martyr. It is a gross omission to leave out Fae's outing, and the continuing drama it provides. Sadly, I'm no Faexpert, and aren't really sure what to add. But this needs fixed. kthx. --Paul Atreides 17:33, 8 September 2013 (EDT)
- I expanded how the "Ash[leyvh]" account was "outed" at the ArbCom case (the Wikipedia Review post), and here's the Wikipedia Review thread where Delicious carbuncle "reveals" that Fæ and Ash are the same person. Frankly, Fæ outed himself in both cases. --JuniusThaddeus 08:59, 11 September 2013 (EDT)


