Site Portals • 2014 in Drama •
ED in the News • Mailing List • Admins • Archive
Donate to ED • Donors • Advertise on ED
Donate to ED • Donors • Advertise on ED
ED is turning TEN in just a few days! Artfags and cooks, please submit cards/art and bake us some pretty cakes!
Talk:Fred Bauder
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=34306:
From: (Cool Hand Luke) Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:02:58 -0600 Subject: [arbcom-l] User:Haiduc I support siteban, but we need to work out what the rule is. We tacitly endorsed the continued editing of Davidwr last year. He came to our awareness when he asked permission for topic socks, fearful that editing on local topics could out him. We denied this arrangement, so he continued under his previous deal. He was unblocked a couple of years ago when Fred and FloNight negotiated his return with an unspoken topic ban. Lately, we're not allowing a topic ban solutions at all. Given the risk of grooming, I think this makes sense. The only distinguishing feature of Davidwr is that his pedo advocacy was done on an edit-segregated account, and the Davidwr account was swept up by Checkuser. Therefore, there's no apparent evidence of advocacy, but does it make sense to rely on this odd fact? We should either revisit his account, or accept it as a historical accident. Frank
--JuniusThaddeus 12:32, 4 December 2014 (EST)


