Donate to ED • Donors • Advertise on ED
User talk:Dutch32
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Welcome, Dutch32
This is serious. READ IT.
Before making your first article look over ED:101. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being banned by ED Sysops.
We realize a lot of you are busy or may be new to ED, so here's just the most important info:
- Read ED:101. Seriously. The information contained within is invaluable.
- Sign your comments using four tildes (like this ~~~~)
- To answer a message, reply on the user's talk page (Tab at the top that says 'discussion').
- These are the sysops. If you have a problem, talk to them. They're here to help, we promise.
- The TJC is the community portal. It's linked to from every page. Check it daily.
- Special:Upload to upload pictures.
- Active editors and sysops can be found on ED IRC. This is the place to go for advice, collaboration, and brownie points.
- See ED:HELP and ED:POLICY for everything else.
Contents |
Use Preview
Please don't flood the Recent Changes. Thank you. Ivo Robotnik: SnooPING AS usual I see! 03:51, 15 June 2012 (EDT)
Alright
Ok, sorry, still learning with this whole editing thing. Dutch32 03:55, 15 June 2012 (EDT)
I think you still don't understand what ED does
Your edits on White Devils were decent but your goal is way off. I like the Rome-Africa comparison pic but it would work better of articles like Africa. No offense, you got potential but you need to know where to implement it. -Gray 04:46, 16 June 2012 (EDT)
Sorry
I didn't realize that my rights end where your feelings begin.
-Dutch32 08:04, 16 June 2012 (EDT)
Allow me to elaborate
- This article got featured twice before you started editing it. It was good.
- Using the Perfect template inflicts nothing but one's own ego.
- Do you even know what the Offended template means? Here is a clue, it's not used on articles that kiss someone's ass.
- It's inconsistency makes me doubt even its completion: It is all pro-white until it reaches the "Politically Correct Alternatives to White" section. Either go for one side (pro-white) or the other (anti-white).
- If I sound like I am rushing you, either rewrite the entire article in a few edits or take it to a sandbox so no one rushes you.
- I suggest you turn it to a different article because OMGMYRACEISTHEGREATESTTHERFOREIISTHEGREATEST bullshit does not amuse most people.
- If I wanted to read a dictionary of every single stupid thing that my overrated race invented, I would search it on Google myself. Do you see how I'm boring you by making you read this long ass comment? This is nowhere near as bad as how much reading that list bored me.
Gray 09:22, 16 June 2012 (EDT)
- Please take my advice of making it a different article. The old version had more time and effort placed than what you ever be able to. That's not an insult, you're just one person, the old version had dozens of people work on it. -Gray 22:41, 16 June 2012 (EDT)
Concerning the White Devil article
Gray has pretty much already presented you with the main reasons why you shouldn't write articles like that, but i'll hammer it in as well, take a quick look at this to understand the goal of ED a little better. We lampoon everything and everyone, we are not white supremacists, we hate everyone equally. Including white people. Hope this helps you understand all the reversions. Elvis 15:08, 17 June 2012 (EDT)
What The Fuck ~Are~ You Doing?
Adding "OK." onto the end of articles? How many times exactly have you done that? Does someone need to go through EVERY single edit you've done on ED to make sure you haven't fucked anything else up? I dunno, maybe it's "post like a retard day" where you're from, but seriously, maybe you ought to stick to READING articles instead of trying to edit them. --Onideus
08:40, 22 June 2012 (EDT)
SUCCESS
THANK YOUUUU Dutch32 08:47, 22 June 2012 (EDT)



